--> At CallCenterOps.com we’re dedicated to providing information about operations management to those involved in real-time customer service via call centers.
Learn how to advertise on this site.
CCOps Home  |  Forum Home  |  Jobs Board  |  Library  |  Operations  |  Resources  |  In The News  |  Site Map

Go Back   CallCenterOps Forum > General Discussion
FAQ Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

General Discussion The CallCenterOps Forum allows you to seek the advice of other knowledgeable call center professionals. Post your call center related question and contribute your opinion to others seeking advice. (No advertising is accepted - posts will be removed.)

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2005, 05:39 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: new york
Posts: 4
Supervisors vs WFM Group

I'm looking for an effective way to hold my supervisors responsible for service level. They are not responsible for forecasting or scheduling; that is done by my WFM team. My WFM team alerts them when too many reps are on aux work and when volume spikes up & calls back up. But not all the supervisors are all too quick to get people back on the phones if they're in the middle of something. They are accountable for their team's utilization but that doesn't measure their responsiveness to service level. I have Avaya CMS version 12.0 and home grown wfm tools; I cannot buy anything else. Any suggestions?
__________________
cjw
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-18-2005, 09:05 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 0
Hi,

i'll say you can hold them responsible for two things:

- AHT length
- Adherence

These are two important factors of your forecasting&scheduling and two for which we hold our supervisors responsible.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-12-2007, 12:11 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 0
Several steps

You are not alone in this!

The above need to be the basis of any strategy that you choose and eventually implement.
What i mean by that is that you can't hold solely the supervisor accountable, but rather recruit his agents as well as his supervisor to monitor the problem of non-adherence on the part of the agents.

The 1st and crucial step is to probe and find a supervisor who actually understands and cares about the big picture and what WFM's role and purpose is in his/her daily activity. Once you level with the sup., then you will be able to work with him as an ally. In other words, you will champion him and his team to address the situation(s) within his own team; rewarding them expressly with whatever gifts, bonuses, incentives, etc you can muster up from YOUR dept. head which will get the other's attention.

Having worked in this environment on both ends of the "switch". I can tell you that the two main driving forces in a call centre are $$ and jealousy.

So think about it in that sense and let me know what you come up with..

Good luck
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Employees evaluating their supervisors Valerie Heimerich General Discussion 0 10-14-2005 10:26 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2